May 2012
1 tag
3 tags
Ladies and gentlemen: my little sister. →
1 tag
Double-A's Drivel: nichellen: doubleadrivel... →
nichellen:
doubleadrivel replied to your post: doubleadrivel replied to your photo: The good old…
SCA of course. Vivat!
Cool! The society in the picture is Lace Wars, which did the Jacobite Rebellion mostly. If I ever earn enough money I’ll probably go to Hazzards in ECWS…
I know what you mean about politics, you need a good CO to avoid the worst of that - I grew up in ECWS (the smells...
1 tag
doubleadrivel replied to your post: doubleadrivel replied to your photo: The good old…
SCA of course. Vivat!
Cool! The society in the picture is Lace Wars, which did the Jacobite Rebellion mostly. If I ever earn enough money I’ll probably go to Hazzards in ECWS or the artillery in ACWS or something (the gun’s gone from LW now). Life was so much simpler when you spent your...
1 tag
doubleadrivel replied to your photo: The good old days when there was money for a…
Same. Except I did medieval recreation.
Oooh, what society were you part of?
3 tags
1 tag
2 tags
Watch
EVERYONE NEEDS TO WATCH THIS NOW AND GET IT ON THEIR BLOG.
2 tags
“Certainly the most destructive vice, if you like, that a person can have, more...”
– (via fuckyeahstephenfry)
going the long way around: 10 Things Us Queers... →
blackgirldangerous:
by Mia McKenzie
I think I’m a pretty self-reflective person. I think I try really hard to listen and learn and grow. I like the idea of evolving. Some days I evolve more than other days. Some days I do the opposite of evolving. Which, I guess, is still evolving, but in…
1 tag
2 tags
1 tag
4 tags
Attention World, there has been a rule change.
catoniss:
From the treaty of the treason:
In penance for you giving us low points in eurovision, each country shall offer up male and female athletes the ages of 18 and 35 at a public ”Reaping.”
These athletes shall be delivered to the custody of London.
And then transferred to a public arena where they will Fight to the Death until a lone victor remains.
Henceforth and forevermore this...
17 tags
20 tags
2 tags
1 tag
Reblog if you have an imaginary life inside your...
deathfeathers:
hundred and hundreds of AUs
2 tags
4 tags
5 tags
6 tags
’Elementary’ Errors By Council See Campaigners Win...
sherlockology:
From the website for Irwin Mitchell Solicitors, legal representatives of the campaign to Save Undershaw:
Undershaw Redevelopment Plans Quashed By High Court
30/05/2012
The man behind a three-year campaign to save the former Surrey home of Sherlock Holmes creator Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is celebrating after winning a high-profile legal challenge to stop the redevelopment of the...
17 tags
20 tags
3 tags
BREAKING: HIGH COURT REJECTS DEVELOPMENT OF...
ladyavenal:
sherlockology:
Just coming down the news wires, the High Court has rejected the decision that led to the granting of planning permission for the redevelopment of Undershaw.
In effect, it means a success for the Save Undershaw campaign, and the building will not be converted into flats.
More as we get it.
Not my gif…..but I feel so proud of those who have been in the thick of...
3 tags
Yay! Undershaw redevelopment plans overturned!!...
2 tags
BREAKING: VERDICT DECIDING THE FUTURE OF UNDERSHAW...
sherlockology:
A spot of developing news - We’ve just been informed by law firm Irwin Mitchell that a verdict is due to decide the future of Undershaw today around 10:30BST - that’s around 30 mins away from our time of writing.
For up to the minute news, we recommend following our Twitter Feed as this develops.
3 tags
1 tag
Watchgayn:
literally my favorite video in the world jfc
4 tags
twoey2e:
1 tag
1am tends to be about the time I start to feel...
2 tags
1 tag
8 tags
4 tags
4 tags
2 tags
17 tags
20 tags
2 tags
2 tags
1 tag
20 tags
17 tags
3 tags
2 tags
The following quotations are taken from official...
Lawyer: "Was that the same nose you broke as a child?"
Witness: "I only have one, you know."
-----
Lawyer: "Now, Mrs. Johnson, how was your first marriage terminated?"
Witness: "By death."
Lawyer: "And by whose death was it terminated?"
-----
Accused, Defending His Own Case: "Did you get a good look at my face when I took your purse?"
The defendant was found guilty and sentenced to ten years in jail.
-----
Lawyer: "What is your date of birth?"
Witness: "July 15th."
Lawyer: "What year?"
Witness: "Every year."
-----
Lawyer: "What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?"
Witness: "Gucci sweats and Reeboks."
-----
Lawyer: "Can you describe what the person who attacked you looked like?"
Witness: "No. He was wearing a mask."
Lawyer: "What was he wearing under the mask?"
Witness: "Er...his face."
-----
Lawyer: "This myasthenia gravis -- does it affect your memory at all?"
Witness: "Yes."
Lawyer: "And in what ways does it affect your memory?"
Witness: "I forget."
Lawyer: "You forget. Can you give us an example of something that you've forgotten?"
-----
Lawyer: "How old is your son, the one living with you?"
Witness: "Thirty-eight or thirty-five, I can't remember which."
Lawyer: "How long has he lived with you?"
Witness: "Forty-five years."
-----
Lawyer: "What was the first thing your husband said to you when he woke that morning?"
Witness: "He said, 'Where am I, Cathy?'"
Lawyer: "And why did that upset you?"
Witness: "My name is Susan."
-----
Lawyer: "Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?"
Witness: "No."
Lawyer: "Did you check for blood pressure?"
Witness: "No."
Lawyer: "Did you check for breathing?"
Witness: "No."
Lawyer: "So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?"
Witness: "No."
Lawyer: "How can you be so sure, Doctor?"
Witness: "Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar."
Lawyer: "But could the patient have still been alive nevertheless?"
Witness: "Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law somewhere."
-----
Lawyer: "What happened then?"
Witness: "He told me, he says, 'I have to kill you because you can identify me.'"
Lawyer: "Did he kill you?"
Witness: "No."
-----
Lawyer: "Now sir, I'm sure you are an intelligent and honest man--"
Witness: "Thank you. If I weren't under oath, I'd return the compliment."
-----
Lawyer: "You were there until the time you left, is that true?"
-----
Lawyer: "So you were gone until you returned?"
-----
Lawyer: "The youngest son, the 20 year old, how old is he?"
-----
Lawyer: "Were you alone or by yourself?"
-----
Witness: "He was about medium height and had a beard."
Lawyer: "Was this a male or a female?"
-----
Lawyer: "I show you Exhibit 3 and ask you if you recognize that picture."
Witness: "That's me."
Lawyer: "Were you present when that picture was taken?"
-----
Lawyer: "Were you present in court this morning when you were sworn in?"
-----
Lawyer: "Do you know how far pregnant you are now?"
Witness: "I'll be three months on November 8."
Lawyer: "Apparently, then, the date of conception was August 8?"
Witness: "Yes."
Lawyer: "What were you doing at that time?"
-----
Lawyer: "She had three children, right?"
Witness: "Yes."
Lawyer: "How many were boys?"
Witness: "None."
Lawyer: "Were there girls?"
-----
Lawyer: "You say that the stairs went down to the basement?"
Witness: "Yes."
Lawyer: "And these stairs, did they go up also?"
-----
Lawyer: "What is your brother-in-law's name?"
Witness: "Borofkin."
Lawyer: "What's his first name?"
Witness: "I can't remember."
Lawyer: "He's been your brother-in-law for years, and you can't remember his first name?"
Witness: "No. I tell you, I'm too excited." (rising and pointing to his brother-in-law) "Nathan, for heaven's sake, tell them your first name!"
-----
Lawyer: "Did you ever stay all night with this man in New York?"
Witness: "I refuse to answer that question.
Lawyer: "Did you ever stay all night with this man in Chicago?"
Witness: "I refuse to answer that question.
Lawyer: "Did you ever stay all night with this man in Miami?"
Witness: "No."
-----
Lawyer: "Doctor, how many autopsies have you performed on dead people?"
Witness: "All my autopsies have been performed on dead people."
-----
Lawyer: "Were you acquainted with the deceased?"
Witness: "Yes sir."
Lawyer: "Before or after he died?"
-----
Lawyer: "When he went, had you gone and had she, if she wanted to and were able, for the time being excluding all the restraints on her not to go, gone also, would he have brought you, meaning you and she, with him to the station?"
Other Lawyer: "Objection. That question should be taken out and shot."
-----
Lawyer: "And what did he do then?"
Witness: "He came home, and next morning he was dead."
Lawyer: "So when he woke up the next morning he was dead?"
-----
Lawyer: "Could you see him from where you were standing?"
Witness: "I could see his head."
Lawyer: "And where was his head?"
Witness: "Just above his shoulders."
-----
Lawyer: "Any suggestions as to what prevented this from being a murder trial instead of an attempted murder trial?"
Witness: "The victim lived."
2 tags
Honey you should see me with my BAFTA.
3 tags
Back from London
Exhausted, in a really good way. I love London.
